Conclusion
Both sides come with their ups and downs. AVG provides a larger set of protection components, which lead to a heavier interface and more complicated settings compared to what Avira has to offer. But the latter does not feature a tool similar to Link Scanner to protect your web surfing from taking a turn to shady websites.
However, the set of features is generally not quite the priority in a user’s choice as the protection offered and resources used are more important aspects. As far as detection is concerned, Avira showed both speed and reliability as it had no problem cutting through malware. AVG also demonstrated its on-access detection capabilities proving once again why it enjoys the appreciation of users worldwide, but it took much longer to finish the on-demand scan, thus using more system resources. However, throwing them in full system scan race, AVG took the lead by a long shot.
In spite of moving fast, we expected a change in the results when commuting Avira’s scanning process priority to low, normal and high. Unfortunately, the differences were too small to consider. At the same test, AVG pointed that this sort of priority change automatically impacts the use of system resources and can speed things up or slow them down.
Feature-wise, AVG has the edge with the Link Scanner that alerts you of the threat level of web pages, Email scanner, which can check your messages against malware, Gaming mode, which removes AVG dialogs when full-screen apps are running. Also, during our testing, AVG finished a full system scan much faster.
Avira, on the other hand, moved lightning fast at our on-demand test, showed strong heuristics and large signature definitions. More than this, the simpler interface and easier configuration panel, even in Expert mode, place it among users’ top preferences.