Immunet Protect 2.0 Stable Release

[sujay]

See Here
http://www.immunet.com/free/index.html
Features
http://www.immunet.com/free/features/index.html

[INDRANIL]

Thanks sujay. Have you tried that??

[sujay]

Thanks sujay. Have you tried that??

I have tried that in the pre-release version. It has improved in terms of features. But the detection seems not improved much.
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2365093,00.asp

There is a pro version too
http://www.immunet.com/plus/compare/index.html
That will perform better too, because it has an additional engine for offline scanning, most probably Bitdefender.

[leofelix]

Thank you sujay
it is time to test IMMUNET 2.0.
I also forgot I promised the developer to translate into italian Imnunet 2.0

[sujay]

@leo: Do the test with the free version and again with the pro version when you will get the key for translation.

[hellnoire]

A note to all future antiviruses that aren't Norton.

STOP. COPYING. NORTON'S. GUI. IT. LOOKS. WORSE. TO. NORTON. HATERS.

That is all.

I seriously am getting annoyed how they are all copying one another.

[leofelix]

@leo: Do the test with the free version and again with the pro version when you will get the key for translation.

I haven't translated it yet, so I do not think I'll test the plus version. Not now at least

[sujay]

Hel, Nortons GUI is much better...

[hellnoire]

Hel, Nortons GUI is much better...

I'm a Norton hater, so I'm going to have to disagree. It looks like a Norton clone to me.

[Ceyfer √]

GUI suck at this new build. They should have keep it simple, user friendly at least. Ask toolbar is also a turn-off, there's an opt-out option available. Scan speed is a bit good.

Courtesy of PC Mag.

Its off-line AV engine is still a mysterious thing to me? Overall, it is still in infancy phase. I won't recommend it right now. Atm go for Panda or Prevx or to any trusted desktop based AV client.