Anti virus Performance test by av-comparatives.

[xje4bv]

Avira, Comodo and Threatfire. Exactly what I had. Then I dropped both Threatfire and Comodo Firewall, in favour of only Avira and Windows Firewall. makes my computer less laggy.

Ontopic, if I'm not mistaken, this just test the least resource hungry AV right? If so, ESET would be the clear winner. But if tested from the scanning perspective, then I'd like to think Kaspersky, Norton and Avira have the upper hand. ESEt has gone a little downhill ever since it became wildly popular.

[In-f3st]

Yeah, depending on only one testing equals like reading only one game review or any review.
I remember when a game called BoF3 came out and in 2 PlayStation magazines it got only 5/10 due to old graphix and whatnot...
But if you look at it now, you'll see that it has very good reviews both by users/gamers and magazines.
If I went by the 2 reviews that I read I would have never played it...
It's needless to say that reviews are basically like opinions and you all know how the saying goes

[laylow21]

it doesnt matter which of the top 3 you use as they will at certain times of the year all swap places as some will add more new signatures than the others at different times.. .. and they will play leap frog on each other..imo.

so choose the one your most comfortable with or even better which ever one you can get for free..

[blackcobra]

it doesnt matter which of the top 3 you use as they will at certain times of the year all swap places as some will add more new signatures than the others at different times.. .. and they will play leap frog on each other..imo.

.

Absolutely correct..